<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strict constitutionalism and anti-tax: the JCP</title>
	<link>http://japan.shadowofiris.com/politics/405/</link>
	<description>japan.shadowofiris.com</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt@occidentalism.org</title>
		<link>http://japan.shadowofiris.com/politics/405/#comment-6608</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt@occidentalism.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 04:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://japan.shadowofiris.com/politics/405/#comment-6608</guid>
		<description>On the issue of the antiwar clause, I am fully behind you. While I think that alteration of the constitution should be taken under serious consideration, it should be an actual change to the constitution, not an unconstitutional "reinterpretation".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the issue of the antiwar clause, I am fully behind you. While I think that alteration of the constitution should be taken under serious consideration, it should be an actual change to the constitution, not an unconstitutional &#8220;reinterpretation&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
